why not just run some cat5 and find out?


"mrbubl" wrote in message
. net...
wrote:
"mrbubl" wrote in message
. net...
Does CAT 3 or a "better" signal than standard 4 wire TELCO cable? If
one was to rewire from the NIB-NIC with CAT wire will their electrons
travel better? read faster connection and the like?

'TELCO' hasn't installed any 4-wire interior wiring in decades. The faux
old-style cable available in the stores is mostly junk. Buy the real
stuff- it doesn't cost much more.

For simple POTS voice service, assuming the outside plant in your
neighborhood is any good, damn near anything will work. If NIB-NIC means
you want to go from the demarc to the computer, a direct line using cat5e
will likely give you a cleaner signal, since the twisting cuts down on
the noise and cross-talk. If you are doing the whole house, definitely
use cat5e or higher, just so you never have to do it again. A direct line
from demarc to computer can make DSL a lot less fussy, if the rest of the
inside wiring is crap.

This place needs a rewire pretty bad, but since I can only get 40k dialup
at the demarc, it ain't real high on my priority list.

aem sends...
I am 17K' away from the CO,and can only get 768K DL and had 1.5 before
with another provider. House has OLD 4 wire and I can easily run CAT5-6
for the ADSL new from the demarc to the server. Don't really care about
voice on this line as it is a data line primarily. The OLD 4 wire was run
by the TELCO way back when 60's-70's as a voice line but would like to
increase my DL speed.

CO did a line check and said there was an error on the line but then
called back and said test was a false + but tried to uncap the line to 1.5
but kept loosing sync. There opinion was everything on there side was
good so that caused me to think I could run a new CAT5-6 line to the
server and things on my side would be "better".