View Single Post
  #170   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking,misc.consumers.frugal-living,sci.electronics.repair,alt.home.repair,misc.consumers.house
Rod Speed Rod Speed is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 40,893
Default Planned Obselescence....A Good Thing?

lsmartino wrote
Rod Speed wrote


Thatīs why the manufacturer puts the charging circuit *inside*
the cellphone or the laptop, to avoid charging problems.


Yes, and why you dont see rechargeable lithium AA and AAA batterys,
because some fool will inevitably put them in an inappropriate charger
and they can go bang very spectacularly indeed.


Not necessarily. They can move the charging circuit to the cell in itself.


Not practical with AA and AAA batterys being discussed.

In spades with an ipod battery.

Of course that will steal space from the chemical part of
the cell with the resultant capacity loss, but it can be done.


But isnt practical and it cant be done with an ipod battery anyway.

Thus the charger used to recharge the battery becames
inmaterial because any proper voltage source will suffice.


The problem aint the voltage source.

In fact, since lithium cells produce 3V, and a AA battery
shouldnīt produce more than 1.5V, I suspect that these
lithium cells have some form of voltage regulating circuit inside.


No they dont. They are in fact nothing like RECHARGABLE lithium technology.

If that is true, then itīs possible that in several
years that circuit will be designed to allow a
safe recharging of a lithium AA or AAA battery.


Its obvious technically possible right now given that cellphones
and ipods etc can obviously charge them fine now, and with
cellphones particularly can handle all of NiMH, NiCad and Lion etc.

The problem is that if they are in AA or AAA format, there
is nothing to stop an individual putting them in an inappropriate
charger and ending up with a massive legal liablity problem.

Also, the IPOD battery is a lithium rechargeable one, so a
lithium battery charging circuit can be made as small as needed.


Yes, but we were discussing why the battery
cant be a STANDARD AA OR AAA FORMAT.


Put simply: if the manufacturer *wants* to design a product with batteries
that can be replaced or recharged the manufacturer *can* do it.


Not with a standard battery format they cant, because that
would inevitably see some put them on inappropriate chargers
that would produce spectacular results when they did that.


The technollogy exists, and in fact itīs in use actually.


No it isnt with STANDARD BATTERY FORMATS.


Take this cordless phone, for instance,


http://gigaset.siemens.com/shc/0,193... html#content


Itīs designed to work with standard AAA rechargeable batteries.


So is mine. Pity it doesnt accept Lithium rechargable AAA batterys.

Also I own a Siemens C4000 cordless phone and it works with
standard AA rechargeable batteries. It can take NiCd or NiMh batteries.


So does my Panasonic, and I bought it for that reason.

It will not however accept lithium rechargable batterys.

Both of my current cellphones, Nokias, will accept all of NiMH,
NiCad and Lion batterys, but they arent AA or AAA format
because there is too much risk with that approach of someone
trying to charge the Lion batterys with a separate charger that
doesnt know how to charge Lion batterys.

So, *if* the manufacturer wants to develop a product
using standard rechageable batteries, *it can do it*.


Nope, because there is no way to stop someone putting
it in a charger that knows nothing about Lion charging.

Even there are different chemistries available,
so if an applicattion works best with a NiMh
battery, or a NiCad one, that battery can be used.


Pity about the problem with putting a lithium battery in a charger
thats designed to charge NiMh and NiCad standard format betterys.