John Beardmore wrote:
In message , Andy Hall writes
On 2006-12-03 17:47:04 +0000, (sarah) said:
The whole premise was to have a range of services from a range of
providers so that people can choose what they want and with local
authorities taken out of the financial path between customer and
supplier. If you want to continue as you are then that is accomodated.
But if you want to continue having your waste collected with an
environmental impact / footprint that as small as it is now, you may not
be, and indeed, there is no guarantee that your existing service
provision would be offered.
a tired argument thats been routed over and over.
Well - this is indeed the big one ! Is there any centralised reporting
and analysis of LCA data broken down by region ? That could certainly
inform a more systematic approach.
what, you mean you dont have the detailed data either? In principle you
could do LCAs for each option if you wished, but there is one problem,
in that you dont appear to have fully grasped the variety of options
open in the freeish marketplace, so would likely be LCAing only one not
especially competitive option.
NT