Thread
:
Wiring re-model work: NM + nailplates vs. BX behind baseboard
View Single Post
#
15
Posted to alt.home.repair
[email protected]
external usenet poster
Posts: 7
Wiring re-model work: NM + nailplates vs. BX behind baseboard
Oops, that should be 10 even, I needed to add a single volume for the
equipment grounds:
2 x 2 device + 1 clamp + 1 EGC + 4 conductors = 10
Great idea about the second non-receptacle like device. I'll consider
that an option.
dan
wrote:
Could I gang two of those boxes together and make a quad receptacle
outlet? That would meet the fill requirement:
2 x 2 devices + 1 clamp + 4 conductors = 9
I am concerned having single duplex receptacles with two-gang sized
faceplates would look sloppy. Then again, I can't say I have seen a
bedroom with all quad outlets before.
dan
John Grabowski wrote:
"Doug Miller" wrote in message
news
In article , "John Grabowski"
wrote:
Unfortunately a 2" x 3" x 2 1/4" metal box is only approved for 5 #14's.
After deducting two conductors for the device he would not be able to
feed
from outlet to outlet using that size box. He would also need to use an
outside connector instead of a box with internal clamps as a one
conductor
deduction is required for that as well.
Nothing stopping him from ganging two such boxes together...
That will work. Good point.
--
Regards,
Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com)
It's time to throw all their damned tea in the harbor again.
Reply With Quote
[email protected]
View Public Profile
Find all posts by
[email protected]