View Single Post
  #15   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
[email protected] jumpind@gmail.com is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default Wiring re-model work: NM + nailplates vs. BX behind baseboard

Oops, that should be 10 even, I needed to add a single volume for the
equipment grounds:

2 x 2 device + 1 clamp + 1 EGC + 4 conductors = 10

Great idea about the second non-receptacle like device. I'll consider
that an option.

dan

wrote:
Could I gang two of those boxes together and make a quad receptacle
outlet? That would meet the fill requirement:

2 x 2 devices + 1 clamp + 4 conductors = 9

I am concerned having single duplex receptacles with two-gang sized
faceplates would look sloppy. Then again, I can't say I have seen a
bedroom with all quad outlets before.

dan

John Grabowski wrote:
"Doug Miller" wrote in message
news
In article , "John Grabowski"

wrote:

Unfortunately a 2" x 3" x 2 1/4" metal box is only approved for 5 #14's.
After deducting two conductors for the device he would not be able to

feed
from outlet to outlet using that size box. He would also need to use an
outside connector instead of a box with internal clamps as a one

conductor
deduction is required for that as well.

Nothing stopping him from ganging two such boxes together...



That will work. Good point.




--
Regards,
Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com)

It's time to throw all their damned tea in the harbor again.