View Single Post
  #10   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
John Grabowski John Grabowski is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,934
Default Wiring re-model work: NM + nailplates vs. BX behind baseboard


"Doug Miller" wrote in message
news
In article , "John Grabowski"

wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...
Thank you everyone for taking time out to help. I have access to one
wall from a crawl space, but from there I'm on my own. I think running
the NM cable sideways will be cleaner and keep the plaster damage down
to a minimum.

Notching the stud and getting the nail plate in would be impossible
without severing the lathe straps, which are mounted directly onto the
stud. The studs are also sideways back-to-back, not like newer
construction, so I'd have to drill through 4" of elderly timber.
Couldn't I just sneak the cable in between the straps of lathe and
cover that with plates? That does sound remarkably easy, though. Too
easy.


With the studs flat like that you will not have enough depth in the wall

to
install a decent size outlet box so that you could go from outlet to

outlet.

Yes, he will. A lath-and-plaster wall is typically about 3/4" thick, which
allows a 2 1/4" deep box even with the studs laid flat.




Unfortunately a 2" x 3" x 2 1/4" metal box is only approved for 5 #14's.
After deducting two conductors for the device he would not be able to feed
from outlet to outlet using that size box. He would also need to use an
outside connector instead of a box with internal clamps as a one conductor
deduction is required for that as well.




If you will be using 14/2 NM you could just notch some of the wood lathe

to
fit the cable through and put a nail plate over the wood lathe.


Not necessary to notch the lath. There should be plenty of room to lay

14-2
between the lath strips -- but it does need to be covered by a plate.


--
Regards,
Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com)

It's time to throw all their damned tea in the harbor again.