On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 17:31:24 -0500, John Fields did most oddly state:
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 17:30:19 GMT, "Homer J Simpson" wrote:
"John Fields" wrote...

BTW, Homer shows more than a little interest in Marge so we must wonder
about YOUR homosexual fixations. You should talk to the 'Reverend'
Phelps.

And your identification with a dysfunctional cartoon character is
healthy? You should talk to a shrink if you can find one who can keep
from laughing in your face.

He is a summation of the US male.

---
Well, imitation _is_ the sincerest form of flattery, I suppose, even if
you're forced to aspire to the dregs because that's the best you can do.

Isn't it the best America can do? At least, on average.

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5
Demon Lord of Confusion
COOSN-029-06-71069
Supreme High Overlord of rec.radio.*
Chuck Lysaght: Tarred & Feathered!
"It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really. I
have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a cesspool
of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to make the
group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why nobody has
bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming engine..
'BAWAHAHA'" -- Dustbin "Outer Filth" K00k's delusions of grandeur
reached new heights, in Message-ID:

"Immorality: The morality of those who are having a better time." -- H.
L. Mencken

"Consider that language a moment. 'Purposefully and materially
supported hostilities against the United States' is in the eye of the
beholder, and this administration has proven itself to be astonishingly
impatient with criticism of any kind. The broad powers given to Bush by
this legislation allow him to capture, indefinitely detain, and refuse a
hearing to any American citizen who speaks out against Iraq or any other
part of the so-called 'War on Terror.'

"If you write a letter to the editor attacking Bush, you could be
deemed as purposefully and materially supporting hostilities against the
United States. If you organize or join a public demonstration against
Iraq, or against the administration, the same designation could befall
you. One dark-comedy aspect of the legislation is that senators or House
members who publicly disagree with Bush, criticize him, or organize
investigations into his dealings could be placed under the same
designation. In effect, Congress just gave Bush the power to lock them
up." -- William Rivers Pitt