On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 16:53:19 -0500, John Fields did most oddly state:
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 20:57:29 GMT, "Homer J Simpson" wrote:
"John Fields" wrote...

Then there's something you _can_ do about it? What, LOL?

**** off low grade morons like you.

You can't even keep yourself from looking like a goddam fool, here,
where trivial **** is concerned and yet you think that you're fit to
determine how the entire world should be run? Forget it. You're
nothing but a low-life piece of **** and that's all you'll ever be so
stop pretending that you're something that doesn't need to be flushed.

Let him have Kuwait and keep gasoline at 99 cents per gallon.

So, as long as you can get gas for 99 cents a gallon you're willing to
look the other way when he kills and tortures thousands of people for
daring to disagree with him, as well as using his own people on which
to test his biological weapons and God knows what all else?

You're quite a piece of work Homer.

Right. Life is so pleasant there now - why the Iraqis keep throwing
flowers at the US troops. Not a single Iraqi was even harmed by the
invasion and occupation - so much better now.

And then there's Kuwait, saved by US troops while their own sons played
in the fleshpots of Europe.

"The one million citizens of Kuwait, where government financial assets
have topped 166 billion dollars, are to receive a grant of 200 dinars
(690 dollars) each, the government has announced. The two million foreign
workers in the oil-rich emirate were not included.

The OPEC member posted a surplus in each of the past seven fiscal years,
totalling more than 50 billion dollars. Kuwait is also headed for record
revenues this year.

The government offered a similar grant in October 2004 and raised
salaries of citizens by 170 dollars monthly last year. MPs in the
outspoken parliament have been pressing for a new hike.

The Gulf Arab state provides a cradle-to-grave welfare system to its
citizens who receive most public services at heavily subsidized prices
and pay no income tax.

Some 92 percent of Kuwait's 300,000-strong workforce are employed in
government jobs, with high wages and minimal work pressure."

Hmmm, and what has happened to the servicemen injured saving Kuwait? The
ones who are in wheel chairs or blind living in run down trailers? Any
money for them?

---
Nope. That wasn't part of the deal.

Gee, why am _I_ not surprised? Of course, who cares what happens to a
bunch of worthless, lowlife grunts who were lucky enough to visit the
Middle East on the taxpayer's dime? They were just lower-income types
anyway, right? Not useful people, like the rich. Not anyone who
_matters_. Well, aside from the rich people who volunteered, but they
were silly. Leave the actual fighting to the little people, the cannon
fodder -- it's what they're for.

Right?

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5
Demon Lord of Confusion
COOSN-029-06-71069
Supreme High Overlord of rec.radio.*
Chuck Lysaght: Tarred & Feathered!
"It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really. I
have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a cesspool
of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to make the
group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why nobody has
bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming engine..
'BAWAHAHA'" -- Dustbin "Outer Filth" K00k's delusions of grandeur
reached new heights, in Message-ID:

"Immorality: The morality of those who are having a better time." -- H.
L. Mencken

"Consider that language a moment. 'Purposefully and materially
supported hostilities against the United States' is in the eye of the
beholder, and this administration has proven itself to be astonishingly
impatient with criticism of any kind. The broad powers given to Bush by
this legislation allow him to capture, indefinitely detain, and refuse a
hearing to any American citizen who speaks out against Iraq or any other
part of the so-called 'War on Terror.'

"If you write a letter to the editor attacking Bush, you could be
deemed as purposefully and materially supporting hostilities against the
United States. If you organize or join a public demonstration against
Iraq, or against the administration, the same designation could befall
you. One dark-comedy aspect of the legislation is that senators or House
members who publicly disagree with Bush, criticize him, or organize
investigations into his dealings could be placed under the same
designation. In effect, Congress just gave Bush the power to lock them
up." -- William Rivers Pitt