On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 21:44:48 +1000, Peter Dettmann did most oddly state:
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 19:12:29 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man" wrote:
Peter Dettmann, the befriender of columbian drug lords and gun runners,
chimed in:
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 05:25:12 GMT, "Homer J Simpson" wrote:
snip

Oh, you're vision impaired. Sorry.

Better than being brain impaired like you.

Your observations are getting furthur from reality the more you go on.
Sensisbly you would stop now before making more of a fool of
yourself.

He's posting on usenet with "Homer J Simpson" as a nick, you ****ing
fool. Who the **** gets embarrassed on usenet, for **** snakes?

Now there are two of you with the same inane disease.

So what leads you to believe that embarrassment on usenet means anything
more significant than a dead dung beetle on Ayers Rock, in the middle of
the last Ice Age? Google "Snarky" or this nick (or the one in my sig) to
see how affected I am by being called all sorts of names.

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5
Demon Lord of Confusion
COOSN-029-06-71069
Supreme High Overlord of rec.radio.*
Chuck Lysaght: Tarred & Feathered!
"It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really. I
have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a cesspool
of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to make the
group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why nobody has
bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming engine..
'BAWAHAHA'" -- Dustbin "Outer Filth" K00k's delusions of grandeur
reached new heights, in Message-ID:

"Immorality: The morality of those who are having a better time." -- H.
L. Mencken

"Consider that language a moment. 'Purposefully and materially
supported hostilities against the United States' is in the eye of the
beholder, and this administration has proven itself to be astonishingly
impatient with criticism of any kind. The broad powers given to Bush by
this legislation allow him to capture, indefinitely detain, and refuse a
hearing to any American citizen who speaks out against Iraq or any other
part of the so-called 'War on Terror.'

"If you write a letter to the editor attacking Bush, you could be
deemed as purposefully and materially supporting hostilities against the
United States. If you organize or join a public demonstration against
Iraq, or against the administration, the same designation could befall
you. One dark-comedy aspect of the legislation is that senators or House
members who publicly disagree with Bush, criticize him, or organize
investigations into his dealings could be placed under the same
designation. In effect, Congress just gave Bush the power to lock them
up." -- William Rivers Pitt