Jeff Wisnia wrote:

Arcane question, and sort of long, but here goes....

Last night, young son was in the process of adding foglights to his car
and asked me for some wire to extend the harness. I wasn't sure what the
current draw would be so I grabbed one of the foglight assemblies and
connected it to the Eico 1050 battery charger/DC power supply which has
been part of my garage tool clutter for nearly 50 years:

http://home.comcast.net/~jwisnia18/temp/eico1050.jpg

When I cranked the voltage up to 13, the bulb lit brightly and the
ammeter on the Eico read around 9 amps. That seemed sort of high to me
so I asked the kid, "How big a fuse is in the harness which came with
those lights?" he looked at it and told me it was a 15 amp fuse. 15 amps
for TWO 9 amp bulbs? Obviously something was't right, so I got my
Simpson 260 and saw that the current drawn by that bulb was really a bit
less than 5 amps.

Since SWMBO was out getting some "retail therapy" I had some free time,
and taking the Eico into my workshop, I opened it up, disconnected the
leads to the ammeter and fed it with my bench supply. That verified
again that it was reading almost twice the DC current passing through it.

By a couple of "cut and trys" I found that about 4 inches of 18 gage
solid copper wire shunting the meter made it read correctly enough for
"gummint work", so I soldered that wire in and closed the Eico back up.

I believe the ammmeter is what I used to know as a "moving iron" type,
and IIRC the restoring force was supplied by some kind of permanant
magnet field, not by a mechanical spring. Am I right about that?

I doubt that Eico installed a defective meter when they built the unit
around 1965 (The date marked on the meter.) and I'm guessing that the
meter's restoring magnet weakened over 50 years, increasing its
sensitivity to nearly double.

Anyone have any similar experience with those kind of meters, I'd enjoy
learning more, just for the ****s and grins of it.

Thanks guys,

Jeff


Isn't there normally a shunt across the meter movement? If so, is it
accurate? If it had changed in value that could account for the
increased reading.