View Single Post
  #11   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
BobK207 BobK207 is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 929
Default Ground Rod Diameter vs grounding performance question

Tom The Great wrote:
On 17 Sep 2006 17:29:09 -0700, "BobK207" wrote:


Tom The Great wrote:
On 16 Sep 2006 23:41:55 -0700, "BobK207" wrote:



If a small diameter ground rod (1/2" or 5/8") doesn't give the 25 ohms
(or less) to ground.....would a larger (3/4" or 1") diameter rod in the
same soil do better?

Is the soil the culprit or the soil / rod contact resistance? The
larger diameter rod contacts more soil..better grounding behavior?

cheers
Bob


IMHO,

I've found (through discussing with electricians) that soil conditions
have a greater effect on grounding effects, when comparing 1/2 to 1"
rods.

Remember, if you are concerned about resistance for code, just drive
the second rod. Then you don't even have to check ohms, since even if
you don't have the min, the code only requires a second rod.

The idea is that everyone grounds the 'neutral' the voltage on teh
grid will be 'stablized' so you are only adding a drop to the bucket
(the grid) and helping your line to your house.

FYI: Ground rods aren't for ground faults.

later,

tom @ www.BlankHelp.com



I know that the code says if you fail the 25 ohm level drive another
rod 6' away.

But I was curious about the variables that effect the performance of
the rod / soil system. I also really liked the technique that someone
posted as to how to test a ground rod; simple & pretty cool

Don't everyone jump on me but I'm not a huge fan of codes in
general.....they tend to substitute blind adherence for understanding
of what's rally going on

ie what is the intent behind the code.

also having worked on committees I know that codes tend to minimum
standards that everyone in the room at the time could live with; either
due to lateness or lack of energy


imho:

Codes are designed for safe operation of you electrical system. The
completion of work below codes is dangerious, and the completion of
work 'over' codes is just extra money spent. Also, if you don't do
'standard' work, another electrician following you will have to
'figure out' what you did.

So, depending on who is spending the money, you might be wasting it.

later,

tom


if one has ground rod that "fails" & puts in another.....conceivably
one could still be above the 25 ohm level but still "meet code".

I'd rather know that my installation was good & I'd rather know what
parameters improve my chances of having a good installtion.

that's why I asked if bigger was better.

looks like longer is better.... I gues that's the way things go

cheers
Bob



Tom-

I agree with your post about work "over" or "under" code (& the
non-standard stuff potenttially being hard to figure out later, that
should be avoided)

but I happen to know of examples of work when done per code (UBC /
IBC structural stuff) will yield a poorly performing system but it
satisfies the code

Example....with the new wood preservative for sill material the code
allows galv or stainless fasteners.....the perfromance difference
between glav & SS is miles

another example....block wall rebar requirements vary all over the map
( a factor of ~3 low to high) from city to city in
SoCal.....earthquakes do not stop at the city limits

I actually have more faith in the NEC (maybe 'cause I don't know it as
well as the structual stuff)

but if the code wants 25 ohms max to earth but it lets you do two rods
& not test?????......where is the performance in that? It's an
assumption that it's probably "good enough" but it could be pretty
bad, couldn't it?

the code is a minimum standard (like a doctor that just barely passed
med school) I'd rather go a little over code (cost impact is usually
prety small) than "at code".....there might be very little margin if
things do not go as expected

btw independent of who is spending, unnecessary overkill is wasting
money.......money spent for no performance increase or a performance
increase that is "unnecessary"

I tend to use SS fasteners for outdoor applications; IMO SS fasteners
(esp in trim, fence, deck or patio cover applications) are worth the
extra cost. SS fasteners in dry locations indoors are wasting money.

I seen a lot of really nice gates ruined by rust stains from galv nails
when less than $20 worth of SS fasteners would have prevented
it....over kill & wasting money or money well spent

Cheers
Bob

cheers
Bob