On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 10:37:13 UTC, "dennis@home"
wrote:


"gort" wrote in message
news

So using activeX which covers 90+% is doing it wrong.
What would you suggest they used to do it correctly?

You mean apart from the big security black hole that is Active X?


Its only a problem if you load activeX programs from untrustworthy places..

A naive view. Even Microsoft ActiveX controls have had security issues
before now.

--
The information contained in this post is copyright the
poster, and specifically may not be published in, or used by
Avenue Supplies, http://avenuesupplies.co.uk