"Richard Lewis" wrote in message
ink.net...
Alan Moore wrote:

Evidently you are having some difficulty understanding the situation.

Me? You missed the one key point, Alan, and you accuse me of not
understanding?

That key point is that *it doesn't matter* what or how you creatively
choose to interpret the numbers....if it's a "CRIME" in the country
that reports it, it's a "CRIME" no matter what.*

Doesn't matter if you want to use some idiocy about bigamy and try to
justify yours by saying it's legal somewhere else. If you are *here*,
it's a "CRIME" and gets reported.

But we aren't talking bigamy.....we are talking "VIOLENT CRIME"....ie
one assault compared to another and the same on murder et al. Your
lame-o logic might hold water if some turd world country like canada
legalized marijuana....you could say that the drugs crimes in canada
as opposed to the US can't be compared. That would hold water. But
we aren't talking marijuana....yet again, we are talking
MURDER/ASSAULT/ROBBERY/RAPE and the onus is on YOU to prove that any
of those aren't considered a crime in the countries in question.

Have you so far?

Has the idiot formerly known as ed?

Is there some suggestion that a murder in this country isn't
considered one in Germany? That a rape here isn't one in England?

Violent crime isn't what the Interpol numbers are comparing, Richard. Gunner
never said it was, Interpol didn't say it was, and I didn't say it was.

Get it? Is it starting to sink into that thick skull of yours, dickhead?

Ed Huntress