"Wanderer" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 17:16:07 +0100, IMM wrote:


"Brian Delaney" wrote in message
...

nss wrote in message
...

Despite what is being claimed, this 'structure' might not
actually have required any building regs or
planning approval.
--
nss

Why not, do you think?

If it falls within the framework work of a "conservatory", then no
planning
or building control is needed.

This may or may not be true, but it is irrelevant in the particular case
reported. The local planning authority had pursued this through the
courts.

Not subject, possibly, to Appeal now?
--
nss