"IMM" wrote in message
...

"Brian Delaney" wrote in message
...

nss wrote in message
...

Despite what is being claimed, this 'structure' might not
actually have required any building regs or
planning approval.
--
nss

Why not, do you think?

If it falls within the framework work of a "conservatory", then no
planning
or building control is needed.
snip

Could someone in 'planning' or 'building-control' have made
a bit of a f***-up?
--
nss