Douglas de Lacey wrote:

Now if you could document that, it would indeed be evidence of a sort.
But not the kind I'd like to focus on, because it depends on no model of
its efficacy, and therefore is not (as it stands) testable. Have any
dowsers offered models of how it works? Have any opponents studied the
apparently verifiable claims of success? I don't know, but no-one in
this thread or its predecessors appears ready to enlighten us.


Why *should* anyone enlighten you?

Does anyone else here care what you think, because I am sure I don't.