mm posted for all of us...
I don't top post - see either inline or at bottom.

On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 21:06:11 -0400, Tekkie®
wrote:

mm posted for all of us...

On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 20:45:01 -0400, Tekkie®
wrote:

posted for all of us...

plus breakers are designed to become MORE sensitive as they age.

Oh boy, do not pay attention to this guy.

What do you think the truth is?

I think the truth can be found on the standards organizations or manufacturers
sites - notably Square D. Holler Butt has spread SO much rumor and conjecture
and opinion in his posts that the reasonable reader CANNOT BELIEVE ANYTHING HE
STATES. When presented with facts he either ignores or goes off on a different
tangent. Previous questionable statement have involved testing circuit
breakers by shorting wires and that faucets are designed to leak from the
factory.

Oh, it sounded like you were saying that that particular statement he
made, at the top, was false. Especially since you deleted everything
else but that one sentence.

I'm afraid you risk losing credibility when you post like that after
he says something which is most likely true. In this case I think it
is obviously, totally true. The only other affordable alternative
would be dangerous. So he was right and your criticism was
ill-placed. If he keeps gaining a point and you keep losing a point,
you won't be a position to contradict him even in cases where he's
wrong.

You can believe what you want, it's not a points race and his statement is BS.
You find in any standards or manufacturers statement breakers are designed to
get weaker with age - HIS words. They are not; along with the other BS he
spews. He is dangerous and a hack.
--
Tekkie