Andy Hall wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 16:50:48 +0100, wrote
(in article . com):
Andy Hall wrote:
windmills...
The reality is that they do and are industrial in nature.
yes, as are the pylons, power lines, telegraph poles, telcomms cabinets
and assorted other bits of industry we live with day in day out.
Exactly, so no need to make it any worse than it already is.
the need for more gen capacity is obvious. As is the fact that some of
it may be windgen.
we're rather wealthier today, and have the funds to make things that
dont look so butt ugly, and the political will to ensure it.
If that were true, nobody would be proposing building industrial windmills in
some of the best natural environment in the country.
illogic
Have fun. It would be more useful to discuss the real issues though, ie
deaths, disease, environment survival, and cost.
The answer to that one is quite simple and is covered by nuclear generation.
how can the important pros and cons of each gen technology be covered
by nuclear generation?
NT