In article , Gunner says...

Did he lie IN his research,....
or about his research?

The first being, he fabricated the data, and
then told the truth about the bogus information;
the second being that he did impeccable
research and published it accurately, but then
lied about the contents when publicizing it?

I guess I'm in a quandry here. I'm not
sure I really see the difference (is there
one?) between the two.

Perhaps I'm missing something here.

Jim

==================================================
please reply to:
JRR(zero) at yktvmv (dot) vnet (dot) ibm (dot) com
==================================================