On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 12:44:18 GMT, "Ed Huntress"
wrote:

"Carl Byrns" wrote in message
.. .

Ed said it was a lie or that Gunner/Ford were crazy which you agreed
with by claiming that he couldn't refute the remark, idiot.

Did you even graduate high school or did you pick up the pussified "I
know you are but what am I?" method of debate from a comic book along
the way?

ral

You know, one of the things I admire about Ed is that he never not
once resorts to insults when he's on the unpopular side of an opinion.
Nor does he try to distort what others have written- he can defend his
position calmly and with solid fact.

You, Gunner, and McCracken don't seem to posess those qualities: if
you can't defend your argument you either make something up or start
slingin' the mud.

I appreciate that, Carl, but I think you must have missed a few of my
postings from time to time. g A sanctimonious jackass like Richard may be
hard to penetrate with facts, so we'll see where that goes.

Ed Huntress


Ed, "sanctimonious jackass" isn't an insult (well, the four legged
kind might be insulted by the association). I've never seen you use
the words f*cking idi*t m*r*n lowl*fe sh*thead pathet*c l*ser in
reference to McCracken or Lewis (I'll cut Gunner some slack here- he
does know a thing or two about machine tools) even though you probably
have shouted the words inside your skull.

-Carl