"JTMcC" wrote

"Carl Nisarel" wrote in message
om...
Gunner wrote

Lott's research amounts to
the largest data set that has ever been put together for any study of
crime, let alone for the study of gun control.

The size of a database is an irrelevant measure of research quality.
Garbage in=garbage out.

Lott's more guns, less crime research has been well-shredded and sent
to the dump where it belongs.

See Ayers & Donohue's articles and Maltz's article, among many others,
which demonstrate that Lott's MGLC research is invalid.

Carl, when your lovely wife, I'm assuming you have a lovely wife, if not you
can fill in the blank with girlfriend, Mom, sis, any person you care deeply
about that doesn't posess great strength and a violent attitude, is
assaulted by a unethical criminal, intent on taking stuff and doing bodily
harm to your loved one, just what would you consider the proper course of
action?

Why do you gunners keep using that irrelevant and idiotic appeal to
emotion fallacy?

You're just demonstrating that you are not intelligent enough to
figure out how to deal with life without a gun.

Your moronic, and unoriginal, retort does not have anything to do with
Lott's invalidated research.