On Sat, 13 May 2006 14:45:28 +0100, "Dave Plowman (News)"
wrote:

In article ,
Mr X wrote:
But to suggest involving the law in a bit of nookie between consenting
adults is going back to the dark ages. And says far more about those who
suggest the law should be involved than the act itself.

Circularity. It happens to be the law. Misconduct in a Public Office is
a very old common-law criminal offence.

Then it's about time it was repealed or forgotten, like dunking witches in
the village pond.

I've already commented on all the points regarding that particular topic.

Good for you.

Goodbye!

And the same to you. Now **** off back to where you came from.

You've been made to look like a loud mouthed buffoon (not that was
difficult) so perhaps you will do us all a favour and adopt your own
advice about 'f..ing off'. Please take Drivel with you when you go.

Recent records (prosecutions) indicate it is not lawful for the lower
levels of public servants to misbehave ( engage in sex in this case)
while on duty. However provided you are a member of the 'upper'
echelon in public service similar behavior becomes permissible, at
least to the extent of not being prosecuted. Why this inequality is
so vigorously defended by many contributors in this thread I find
curious. Perhaps an explanation is the UK is such a class ridden
society.