The Natural Philosopher wrote:
The Reid wrote:
Following up to Adrian Tupper
I don't agree with that "utilitarian" viewpoint. You can't add up
lots of small amounts of different people's inconveniences and say
that's worse than one or two fatalities. We only experience our own
inconvenience, which I'm happy to do if it avoids pedestrians being hit.

so you *would* support a 10 mph urban speed limit?

hah. I'd love to see them out with radar guns busting all the joggers
doing 11mph on the pavement.

AND all the cyclists doing 15mph.

Does the law apply to cyclists and pedestrians in the same way as
it does to motors?