DIYbanter - View Single Post

(Doug Miller) wrote in
om:

In article , Jim Yanik
wrote:
"Joseph Meehan" wrote in
:

Jim Yanik wrote:
"Joseph Meehan" wrote in
:

moncheri wrote:
Joseph Meehan wrote:
Jim Yanik wrote:
"Joseph Meehan" wrote in
:

Let's back up a little. Why do you want those immigration
laws
that keep out others.

Every country has their own form of immigration laws. People
come here for a chance to better themselves but most do it
legally. I lived in Central America for 1 year decades ago and
even they have immigration laws. By the way I was there legally.
Talk to the legal immigrants and you will find they are every
bit as angry as the rest of us. They feel it isn't right to
reward the law breakers by giving them amnesty, they feel anger
that those are the same people who are causing the single largest
strain on America's economy in medical, educational and legal
cost which by the way the legal immigrants help pay for.

I live and work among a large hispanic population and have
absolutely no problem with any one I know. However, every day I
see how our system is being overwhelmed by the sheer size of the
growing load being placed on it. I can see our system reaching
a breaking point in the not so distant future if we don't begin
applying the laws already on the books.

I live in a small city close to a large city. Our school,
fire police
etc are all being stretched. Should be put up a fence and limit
those who can come in? Just to make sure that no one comes and
stays, we would also need to limit visitors as well. Do you
think this is a good idea?

The state also has problems so what are your thoughts about
doing the
same for the state as well?

That is NOT the equivalent of National borders.Get a clue.

Why should it be different? If it is needed or a good idea at a
National border, why should it not be a good ideal or needed at a
local boarder?

As I said;get a clue.

Actually, Jim, I have to agree with Joseph he if a state wants to
control its borders, and prevent criminals from entering from other
states, it should have every right to do so.

I think US CITIZENS;criminals or not,have the right to travel freely within
the US,unless restricted by a court of law.
Foreigners do not have that right.
There's a number of rights foreigners do not have in the US.

Also,supposedly,after a criminal has served their time,they've paid for
their crime,and enjoy most if not all of the rights other CITIZENS have.

You folks keep confusing CITIZENS and LEGAL foreigners with illegals.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net