John Doe wrote:

David Maynard nospam private.net wrote:


Pig Bladder wrote:


On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:52:27 -0600, David Maynard wrote:



Gary H wrote:



Mxsmanic wrote:



Many people refuse to believe that anyone could become more
successful than themselves through purely legitimate means
because it implies that these such a person might be smarter
than they are, and they cannot accept this possibility.


Awwww, please don't practice your dime store psychology on me? I
know Bill Gates is much much smarter than I am, no question
about it. I didn't say he wasn't. I merely said he was a thief
with accomplices before and after the fact. Why do you have to
make it complicated? :-)


Because David Maynard doesn't have a real argument.

That was Pig Bladder speaking to Mxsmanic, not that accuracy was ever a
consideration for you.

Because you demonstrate the trait even in the denial of it.


You certainly are showing a lot of the symptoms of this "denial"
you so glibly bandy about, however.

Name one.


One example is your opinion that Microsoft doesn't hold monopoly
power. That's some serious denial.


Considering that I have refused to even discuss the topic with you, have
never said such a thing, and have reminded you of these facts uncounted
times you're not only incorrect but a bald face liar, or demented.

Which, as I have also told you numerous times, is one reason why I won't
discuss it with you.

Let's see, the other message you reached back into February for and this
one you went back to Dec 15 of last year.