"Guy King" wrote in message
...
The message
from Andy Hall contains these words:

The author has made the typical confusion between combi and condensing
boilers. One might expect it in the press - even the Telegraph
doesn't always get things right - but one would have hoped that a
journal purporting to explain science could do a bit better than this.

Well, it was a letter rather than an article, so New Scientist isn't
directly responsible for the views expressed, but often the debate
stimulated by such letters is revealing.

Anyway, just 'cos he mentions combination boilers and may have meant
condensing boilers doesn't mean the whole argument is wrong. I happen to
think he may well have a point.

He hasn't a point at all. This is tabloid misinformation crap based on firm
data at all.