On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 05:04:15 GMT, Roy L. Fuchs
wrote:

On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:43:55 GMT, "Anthony Fremont"
Gave us:


"Roy L. Fuchs" wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:48:49 GMT, "Anthony Fremont"
Gave us:


http://www.oatleyelectronics.com/leds.htm
Just scroll down to the IR LEDs and see how wrong you are about Vf on
IR
LEDs. Though I really don't understand how the 1.65 Vf LED can
dissipate less power at 50mA than the 1.25 Vf LED does.

More proof of your idiocy.

The power ratings they give are for output, not consumption.

So are you saying that the power out doesn't equal the power in?

Hahahah... Will you EVER know how stupid the remark you just made
is?

BTW,
luminous intensity is never stated/measured in watts.

NEVER? It appears that you don't know how to read the specs THEY
POSTED, you retarded twit. EVERY produced energy has a wattage
allegory.

The proof is that you can't even GET what you attempt to read.

The above statement still stands.

Here's a test, boy. Give an example of ANY device or transducer
where the "power out" equals the "power in".

My mother in law:

I tell her no (-1) and she replies YES ( +1)

Can't you discuss it rather then arguing about ?

Maybe in your quest, you will actually get a clue.