On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 08:00:02 -0000, Rob Morley
wrote:

In article
Phil L wrote:
raden wrote:
In message , Grunff
writes
mad man wrote:
Any feedback on how good or bad.
As they seem very cost effective.


Why is it that "cost effective" has almost completely replaced the
word "cheap"?
I saw some DVDs for sale today which were "Previously owned" rather
than second hand

That's along the same lines as a car dealer near me, who uses the vomitous
Americanism, 'Pre-Loved' to describe his cheesy collection of rusting
Cavaliers and clapped-out Fiats

Pre-loved as in someone else has already shagged them?
I think the guy has a sense of humour.


Do keep in mind that the 'Merkins use the term "shagging" differently
to its common UK understanding

http://www.goshagging.com/

I suppose that both are "dancing" though....


--

..andy


Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com