Ignoramus6463 wrote:

In article .net, Richard Lewis wrote:
Ignoramus19432 wrote:

By now, it is clear that Bush had no evidence of Iraqi weapons of mass
destruction and was lying throughout the whole affair.

It is, idiot?

Got any proof?

Proof of what? That he had no evidence? That's simple, he has not
produced any evidence that he had at the time when he launched the
war.

Proof that it "is clear that Bush had no evidence" as you stated,
idiot.

That he was lying? Just refer to his earlier speeches about dangers of
Iraqi WMD...

The same ones the UN said, klinton said, congress said, iraq said etc
etc etc?

Hint: stating something you believe to be true isn't lying, idiot.

ral

i