On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 21:04:54 -0000, "Doctor Drivel"
wrote:


The logic behind that is that he will have stiil trouble from a cheap and
nasty product as he is renting out. Whether he is there or not it is still
his problem. Best get a quality product that will give some sort of
longevity and reliability.

He said he *may* rent it out or *may* sell.

If he sells then a cheap boiler is the best option.

If he decides to rent then a cheap boiler is still the best option
imo. Firstly, tenants have a habit of breaking things and it's better
that they break a cheap boiler than an expensive one.

Secondly, he can replace the cheap boiler with an expensive one five
or ten years down the road and presumably offset the cost for taxation
purposes.

sponix