"Ed Huntress" wrote in message
...
"Steve B" wrote in message
news:8EcIf.38834$JT.22325@fed1read06...
Good ****ing grief, Charlie Brown.

Do you ever watch the weather?

You know, when they say the high today was 46, and in 1941, the high for
today was 66? If global warming was a reality, and the temperature rose
since 1941, it probably would have been 146 degrees today!

Temperatures are freaky spikes in nature. Up one year and down the next.

Reading anything else into it is utter paranoia.

Get over it. Or go get some therapy.

Steve

Steve, is that supposed to be an argument regarding global warming? I'm
serious here. I think an average 10-year-old can do better.

You're looking at ONE DAY, comparing ONE PAIR OF YEARS. Does the inanity
of
that not strike you right between the eyes?

I mean, c'mon. Nobody is that numb.

--
Ed Huntress


No, the inanity is the same fact that the world is estimated to have a
finite lifetime, and that it will probably end in a few hundred million
years, or in 2012 by meteor impact as predicted by several ancient
societies.

Point is, global warming won't really affect anyone for such a long time
that they won't have to worry about it in their (our)(your)(my) lifetime,
and all this sniveling is boring and annoying.

Steve