On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 18:28:09 -0000, "Doctor Drivel"
wrote:


"Tim S" wrote in message
.. .
Dave wrote:

Ed Sirett wrote:

Part P has done much to erode the rule of law.

What can one expect of the dunce that started this?

When I see the 'ODPM' I quake, as he is so incompetent.

If he had half a brain, if only :-)

Dave

To be fair, Fatman John is not actually
dreaming up most of this crap - it's
more often than not in response to
some directive from the EU.

I can find the directive behind Part P
if you wish for some evidence.

Firstly, Part P is sound. Its aim is sound too. Secondly. many EU
directive have to be followed, and most are sound too. Thirdly, gov
ministers don't dream anything in depth. The detail is in ministries and
they at times hire the services of outside experts and go by that/them.

It is clear most people here have no idea of how the government works.


ROTFL.

You really are speaking ou of both sides of your mouth, just like the
proponents of this legislation.

On the one hand you tear into CORGI and what it does, while on the
other you say that Part P, which is nothing like as well organised is
OK.

This is complete nonsense.


--

..andy