In article , Gunner says...

Actually..not so. Bush said there was no evidence that Saddam was
involved in 9/11. Period. There is plenty of evidence that Iraq has ties
to Al Quida etc.

But nowhere do you ever hear anything much about the
Saudis. Now *there*'s a conspiracy.

;;; Clearly it was not a lie on his
part. Even if the information was later proven to be false, he acted on
it in good faith at the time.

So, hhm. Either he's a liar (not) or a dummy.

Either way it bodes ill.

Jim

==================================================
please reply to:
JRR(zero) at yktvmv (dot) vnet (dot) ibm (dot) com
==================================================