Dave Balderstone wrote:

In article , Joe
Barta wrote:

You miss the point... the point is to isolate issues of
contention. If you can't do that, then what's the use of further
discussion?

But you want to discuss issues in a context that has no basis in
reality.

To remove the profit motive from the discussion means we're
talking fiction.

Quite honestly, I can't see why you're having such a hard time doing
this. It's a simple thought excercise.

Imagine a nonprofit entity... they get their money from whoknowswhere.

Can you see any benefit coming out of the nonprofit providing search
results for the Chinese people even though at this time some results
will be censored with a notation stating such on the search results
page?

(IIRC, the search results, if censored, will indeed have a notice on
them. Unfortunately I'm not 100% certain of this and am too lazy to
check at the moment ;-)

Joe Barta