OT - Tim Daneluk
In article .com, "entfillet" wrote:
"LOL -- you've been caught pretending to knowledge you do not possess.
Perhaps
you should have talked to a *real* chess player before you tried to
impersonate one, so that you'd have half a chance of succeeding."
I'm sorry that you did not see the humor in my characterizing Mr. D's
arguments as a series of lame and/or impossible moves. I would have
thought that the use of the outdated notation form would have given it
away. I would have thought that not being able to castle due to
"insufficent pieces" would have been the final straw but...apparently
not. I will try to be even less subtle in the future.
You missed the point entirely -- which was that the notation you used is
completely incorrect. Rather than "KP-KP3", for example, it should be "P-K3".
There is no such square as "KP3". A real chess player would have known that.
BTW - I let my USCF membership lapse a few years ago and so am
technically not rated any longer but, if you would like to stop by for
a game some time, that would be fine.
Uh-huh. And what was your last rating?
Bring money.
I'm not worried.
--
Regards,
Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com)
It's time to throw all their damned tea in the harbor again.
|