Ned Simmons wrote:
In article .com,
says...
Jesus there's a lot of ****e on this thread.
I think if you were to read the responses carefully you'd find only a
few glaring errors in reasoning. Most everyone reached the same
conclusion, though some in roundabout and not always clearly expressed
ways.
you're prolly right, I tend to skim rather than read in depth
Perhaps you'd prefer a thread on WMDs or the circumstances of Vince
Foster's death g.
dunno who vince foster is, as far as wmd's go I have never had any
illusions, if fact the only people who seem to be disconnected from
reality are those that rely on the mainstream media H^H^H^H propoganda
for their "facts"
the next 20 years sure are going to be interesting times.