On 15 Jan 2006 16:03:36 -0800, with neither quill nor qualm, "rigger"
quickly quoth:

Joseph Gwinn wrote:
There were a number of postings on the tort suit McDonalds lost because
their coffee was too hot, at 180 degrees F, scalding a woman who tried
to hold the cup between her legs in the car.

We just got a brand new Krups coffeemaker, and I got curious, and
measured the coffee temperature. It's 180 degrees F, just like the
coffee books recommend.

Think someone will sue Krups?

Joe Gwinn


I doubt anyone will sue.

However, will you, now knowing the coffee is hot enough to quickly
scald, serve your grandmother a fresh, full, covered styrofoam cup?
When she's used to cooler coffee? Especially when you know the top of
the cup sticks? As she's getting into a car? And not warn her?

Uh, yeah. We have all seen the HOT warning on every cup. I figure
she's been around enough to know that coffee is hot enough to burn
her. She's been brewing it for OVER 60 YEARS NOW, riggy. We've
-all- been burned by hot coffee before and we're cautious.


Only an asshole would do such a thing, right?

If so, the majority of us are assholes.


Is it different if it's not YOUR grandmother?

No. Why should it be? It's common sense.


Is this understandable by the average, prudent person?

Hey, if some scatterbrained old biddy came into the room and
clearly didn't have any sense of presense, we'd ALL have given
her extra care instructions. But that evidently didn't happen.
She ****ed up multiple times, first by trying that, second by
not reacting at all to the spill (like pulling the hot cloth
off her body parts. Sweatpants DO have a lot of room in them,
they DO come down quickly, and blowing on hot cloth cools it
very rapidly. She evidently did none of that. C'est la vie.

NEXT!


----------------------------------------------
Never attempt to traverse a chasm in two leaps
http://www.diversify.com Comprehensive Website Design
================================================== =========