View Single Post
  #54   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
Andy Hall
 
Posts: n/a
Default Rayburn efficiency?

On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:03:17 +0000, Huge wrote:

On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 04:00:01 -0800, owdma wrote:


Huge wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:17:12 +0000, Andy Hall wrote:

On 13 Jan 2006 01:07:12 -0800, wrote:


[Snippage]


In other words, it's not a UL at all.


Exactly - and I've seen the same in many houses in fact I don't think I've
ever seen an Aga kitchen which didn't have a good range of cooking
"accessories". I've been in hundreds of kitchens as part of my job. When
we had a Rayburn on it's own it was a complete PITA and we soon added a
gas cooker etc but kept the Rayburn as space and water heater and
occasional cooker. Not very good as a space heater as was not possible to
regulate it. Crap as a cooker.


Oh, I disagree. I quite enjoyed cooking on an Aga. It just wasn't worth
putting up with the kilowatts of waste heat.


Perhaps you had an old one or something. On our (recent model) gas
one with modulating burner, the gas consumption works out to a steady
state equivalent of about 700W. Since virtually all of this is
released within the envelope of the house, there is no real waste at
all.

Contrast this with our former arrangement of a fan oven and gas hob,
it could work out that when cooking a complex meal that 10-12kW or
more is released from this lot. Then the windows have to be opened
wide to maintain a sensible temperature. That's what I call a waste.


--

..andy