In article .com, Gus says...

I suppose the Dover case you're mentioning has to do with intelligent
design. The way I heard it, there was no "teaching" of it.

As you say, not what the court found. Also not what the
rest of the voters found, because by the time the case came
to trial, the idiots who tried to ram religious education
into public schools had been resoundingly defeated by the
"anti-ID" slate of board candidates.

Basically those folks wanted to teach religion in public
schools, and lied about their motives to get it installed.

They're in hot water now, as those lies are going to
cost them court fees, and the other parties' lawyer fees.

Good.

Jim


--
==================================================
please reply to:
JRR(zero) at pkmfgvm4 (dot) vnet (dot) ibm (dot) com
==================================================