"Tim Daneliuk" wrote in message
...

Hee, hee - I was just teasin' Charlie - I often don't agree with her
either. I do not, however, think she is "vile". You may not like her
ideas, but at least she hasn't, say, gotten drunk, dunked her car into
a river, killed her fellow passenger, and then lied about it all. *That*
is vile.

One action, or series of actions, by one person, something over 30 years
ago, and that seems to be all many people can think of. Coulter IS vile. She
would murder if she thought she could get away with, and she incites others
to do so.


Ann is also right about some things now and then. But mostly, she is
entertaining. I love to watch the Rightwingers wince and the Lefties
shriek when she says something especially provocative. It's mighty
entertaining to see someone treat politics for the complete sham that
it is.

Political commentators need to be entertaining, but when their entertainment
is primarily shock value from moronic and dangerous attitudes, then they are
vile.

BTW, I cannot abide Howard Stern. He is provocative without a shred
of entertainment value nor any demonstration of IQ above shoe size.
I'm quite happy for him to be on sat radio so I can never again
accidentally come across his puerile droolings on radio or TV...

Can you believe he got half a billion bucks? For what? I really don't need
anyone to teach me how to cuss, and that seems to be all he does. He's not
even talented at it.

By the way, you're wrong about his IQ, unless he wears a terribly small
shoe. He has the IQ of a Pet Rock or a Pet Rock buyer.