"Dave Plowman (News)" through a haze of senile
flatulence wrote in message ...
In article ,
Andy Hall aka Matt wrote:

Fine in theory. But in practice it was a take it or leave it situation
with no negotiation possible by an individual, since that individual was
easily replaced. Not so the entire workforce.

OK, so crew goes to customer and this is agreed.

That *is* a union. One for all and all for one.

It still doesn't require an external union.

Much easier to have a pro to argue the case. No problems with
victimisation afterwards.

I take it you've never had any dealings with industrial relations?

No he hasn't, each time he had the dead sack and frog marched out.