"Lew Hartswick" wrote in message
k.net...
Harold and Susan Vordos wrote:

While I normally bottom post, I'm suggesting that John & George have a
case.
One reason I suggest they do is that when I click on a post to respond,
I
find my cursor at the top of the post, ready to accept my response.
Why
would it be there if that isn't where I should be typing?

Still, aside from this particular post, you'll find my responses at the
end------with the unnecessary information typically clipped.

Harold

Thats strange to me because my reader puts the cursor at the bottom and
I have to back up delete all the unnecessary garbage.
Different readers I guess.
...lew...

Likely so------as I'm discovering. To me, what I have surely must be what
everyone else has, right? g

I'm what could easily be considered computer illiterate. I've used only the
computer that sits in front of me, so I'm not familiar with anything but
Windows Me and Outlook Express. At my age, I'm damned proud that I'm able
to use one at all.

Top post or bottom post, makes no difference to me, but it sure as hell
would be a kindness for folks to clip that which is not important when
replying. Some replies are nothing short of a waste of time----doing
nothing more than re-quoting that which has already been re-quoted.
Sigh.

One of the biggest offenders is our good friend, Gunner. Still, it's
better to have to wade through the endless quotes than to not hear from him
at all.

Harold