Hawke wrote:
Private property is defined as land, houses and chattels owned
absolutely. Ownership can be (a) absolute, or (b) qualified.
Estate is held with an interest (less than title).
Can one conclude that estate is held with qualified ownership?

The fifth amendment says PRIVATE property shall not be taken for public
use
without just compensation. There's no mention that ESTATE shall not be
taken for public use without just compensation.

Absolute ownership is a right, not subject to taxation.
Qualified ownership is a privilege, granted by government and subject to
taxation.

?There is no Georgia statute compelling the recording of a deed.?
- - - Encyclopedia of Georgia Law, 8 A, p. 265, Sec. 132

See, here is your problem. You have a supposed fact here. There is no
Georgia statute compelling the recording of a deed. But look at the
reality. Are deeds recorded in Georgia? Yes they are, but according to
your citation there is no statute compelling this. So what?

Were people led to believe that they were obligated?
Yes.
By whom?
You figure it out.

Whether there
is a statute or not is irrelevant.

Certainly it is relevant. Law is law. False assumptions are not law. Those
who promulgate fraud to your detriment are your persecutors.

By custom, tradition, or whatever you
want to call it all transfers of real property in the state of Georgia are
recorded.

Governments do not act upon a whim, but upon specific delegations of
authority. To believe otherwise, is to be deluded.
Go and read the specific taxing authority in your state's constitution.
Then read the explicit taxing statute as enacted by your state.
Then re-read the definitions for estate and private property.
No state taxes private property. They only tax estate (real and personal
property held with qualified ownership).

If you try to sell real estate without recording it you will
fail. Because the interconnection of laws and customs is so well set that
there is a defacto compulsion to record deeds. So you see, your fact is
meaningless.

No, factual information has much meaning. For example, if you do NOT record
your deed, and do not register with the real estate clerk, you won't be
levied a property tax, since you are not listed in their records as a
holder of estate.

Of course, ignorance of the real law favors those who are preying upon us.

Is it a coincidence that the creditor demands that you record your deed as
"estate"?

Feel free to ask your public servants.
They may even answer you.
But don't hold your breath waiting ...