View Single Post
  #70   Report Post  
Posted to misc.consumers.frugal-living,rec.crafts.metalworking,misc.survivalism,alt.politics
Hawke
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT - Betting On Social Security?


"Jet Graphics" wrote in message
...
Rod Speed wrote:

Jet Graphics wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Jet Graphics wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Jet Graphics wrote
Rod Speed wrote


The vast majority of wealth in America
in private hands is inherited wealth.


Wrong, the vast bulk of it has been accumulated
by the individual, and is the house they are
paying off and their retirement savings.


Actually, both are incorrect.


Nope.


And without any facts in support of the objection, moving on...


Lie. The facts are still there in the quoting.


Incorrect conclusion.


It isnt a conclusion, its a statement of fact.


So far, you haven't provided any "fact" but your uneducated opinion.
Everyone has opinions, but when you can't quote one fact in support, your
opinion is not persuasive.

No facts in evidence to rebut the statement that both were wrong,


Lie, the evidence that I wasnt wrong was in that bit still in the

quoting.

It appears that you do not comprehend written language nor definitions of
terms. Perhaps I should use smaller words:

Slaves - do - not - own - themselves.
Voluntary - slaves - do - not - own - themselves.
Even if Massuh lets the slave into the big house and keep a few things for
himself, if Massuh wants, slave gets the boot, and loses all those things.

because absolute ownership is abolished by national socialism.


Complete pack of pig ignorant silly lies.


So far, you have not provided one shred of evidence to dispute the
definitions previously posted. Ergo, you must be the one filled to the

brim
with "pig ignorant silly lies."


And since this is the best you can manage, here
goes the chain on the rest of your mindless silly ****.


Apparently you have comprehension issues with language.
When facts, with authoritative references are presented, you become so
defensive of your ignorance that you have to resort to vulgarity to

express
yourself.

The vulgarity and invective reflects poorly upon you and your arguments.
But, then, you may be the "new socialist man" that the system relies upon

to
remain in harness, deaf and dumb.

Good luck, don't rattle your chains too loudly, and pass into oblivion.





Facts you have. But the conclusions you draw from them are non sequitur and
your comprehension of them is sorely lacking. Find a teacher to explain to
you what you have read. You're not getting it on your own.

Hawke