Too_Many_Tools wrote:

Social Security could be big chill

Socialist InSecurity has been the biggest con perpetrated upon the American
people (and much of the world, in other forms).

Why?

The Federal Insurance Contribution Act / Social Security Act of 1935 was NOT
"insurance" for the American people.

The Congressional Research Service declares that there is no property right
inherent in entitlements under FICA/SocSec. They are synonymous with
"gifts" and Congress can change the contribution rate and the entitlements
at ANY TIME.

The legal consequences of accepting "gifts" from the public treasury are
less than beneficial, despite the assumption that "freebies" from
government are grand.

In law, one who accepts charity from the public treasury is known as a
pauper / vagrant. Only those who "voluntarily" enroll into national
socialism are eligible for "entitlements". Ergo, one who is eligible, is
pauperized.

Coincidentally, that is why the government has abandoned the "homeless".
They can't prosecute them as vagrants (status criminals) while ignoring the
millions of other vagrants who are residing at residences. Of course, you
weren't told that a DOMICILE is a legal home of an inhabitant. A "legal
residence" is not a domicile. Every "resident" residing at a residence is
presumed to be a transient vagabond.

Bizarre? Read the law for yourself.

Prior to 1935, paupers and vagrants suffered plenty of constitutional abuse.
FDR lied when he told folks that "Relief was not charity" - few Americans
would have signed up if they knew the truth.

Over the generations since that evil deed, America has been transformed from
a capitalist nation into a socialist nation.

Capitalism is defined as the ownership and enjoyment of PRIVATE PROPERTY.

In case you are unaware, Socialism abolishes private property. Private
property is legally defined as land, houses and chattels owned ABSOLUTELY
by an individual. In contrast, estate (real and personal property) is
defined as that which is held with an interest LESS THAN TITLE, by a person
or persons. It is a fact that no state or federal constitution delegates
power over private property. Careful reading will show that the government
only can tax ESTATE, not private property. Furthermore, if private property
is taken for public use, the owner is due JUST COMPENSATION. However,
estate is not protected, thus can be condemned for back taxes, mortgages,
etc.,etc. without just compensation.

In a nutshell, the U.S.Congress went bankrupt to a gang of international
usurers in 1933, caused by the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. Since the
bankrupted U.S. had no assets that the creditor could attach, the Congress
was made trustees of their own bankruptcy. In law, trustee is the highest
obligation and it supersedes all others. Neat trick, eh?

Congress obliged their creditor with passing the first Socialist inSecurity
act, but was ruled by the Supreme court as unconstitutional. FDR rushed out
an got an international treaty that legitimized the second version, passed
in 1935.

In law, a contributor is one who is equally liable for paying a claim. Every
American who signed up under the Federal Insurance CONTRIBUTION act
underwrote the national debt, which was unpayable then as now. ($7
trillions is far greater than the underlying notes (evidences of debt), and
there isn't enough gold nor silver in the whole world to retire that debt
with lawful monies of the U.S.A., pursuant to the Coinage Act of 1792, et
seq.)

That obligation also underpins the legal tender of repudiated notes. In
House Joint Resolution of March, 1933, Congress declared it would no longer
redeem their notes for real money. However, if YOU are a contributor,
enrolled and enumerated, you have no legal right to object to the tender of
worthless notes that YOU ARE OBLIGATED TO PAY.

Your valuable labor and property are stolen, via usury and socialism. And
you have no legal right to object to the theft.

That's the whole key to their scam.

Every numbered socialist surrendered his absolute right to own himself, his
children, his labor and that which he exchanges his labor for, in exchange
for the impossible obligation to pay the national debt, eligibility for
entitlements (pauperization), and dropping to the lowest status at law,
excepted from the rights and powers of the free inhabitants, and the
privileges and immunities of the free citizens.

In case you were unaware, natural and personal liberty are NOT civil
liberty. Civil liberty is that which the GOVERNMENT GIVES (and takes away).

When Patrick Henry cried out: "Give me liberty or give me death!" he wasn't
referring to civil or political liberty. He was speaking of natural and
personal liberty of the free man, not beholden to any lord or monarch.

As long as you consent, via participation in national socialism, you are
your own worst enemy.