Why aren't computer clocks as accurate as cheap quartz watches?
David Maynard wrote:
DevilsPGD wrote:
In message David Maynard
wrote:
snip
Hell if I know but I just got one dated 1969.
That's usually because the date header was missing completely, and some
system along the way assigned a header of Jan 1 1970 -0000, then
corrected for timezone shift.
Possible. But that doesn't explain the ones dated 2001.
They were sent through HAL.
"Dave? What are you doing, Dave?"
--
"Damn AOL. Then was the September of our discontent."-
Tim Haynes, c.o.l.s, 11-30-01
|