View Single Post
  #26   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
raden
 
Posts: n/a
Default Safety Awareness!

In message , John
writes

wrote in message
oups.com...
raden wrote:
In message , Dave Fawthrop
writes
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 16:08:05 +0000 (GMT), "Dave Plowman (News)"
wrote:


The number plate reading cameras in Bradford got the number of the
getaway
car of the gang who killed the policewoman. Lead them straight to a
gang
in London. Other number plate reading cameras then tracked it down the
M1.

I thought that it said on the news tonight that they'd ALL been released
without trial - in other words, they detained the wrong people


Whether in one particular case it got them or not, does this justify
universal surveillance? We could catch many more criminals if everyones
house were wired up for centrally controlled surveillance. Is it worth
it? Is it what we want?



Did we want part P? did we want to be watched by automatic systems when we
drive? Did we want a thick **** in charge of all this?


And at the end of the day, David Icke will turn round and say "I told
you all this would happen" because it's going just as he predicted


--
geoff