View Single Post
  #13   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
Proctologically Violated©®
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT--Home Depot revisited

Harold is not only a (confirmed) chest-thumping pathological asshole, he's
proly a pathological liar, as well.
To wit:
Real quick, let's calculate, boyzngerlz, the *probability* of his unlikely
yarn being true, by simply multiplying the individual probabilities of each
unlikely event (valid for independent events).

0. P(that that cashier is even still employed at sed HD): .5
1. P(of harold getting same checkout girl): mebbe .1 (since he indicates
she just *happened* to be there--woulda been far more believable had he
asserted that he sought her out, lying cocksucker...)
2. P(that sed girl even recognized Harold's squirrely cocksucking self):
..1
3. P(that iffin she did, she would *at all talk* to this cocksucker, other
than to curse his wrinkled sagging ass): .001 (max)
4. P(that the same fukn guy (our protagonist??) *also* woulda chosen the
same checkout girl): .1 (max)
5. P(that she, a cashier and NOT a manager, woulda kept a fukn store
receipt of a customer): .001
6. P(that she, a cashier and NOT a manager, would engage a customer in this
way): .001
7. P(that she would/could bill him for a previous purchase???? you lyin
sack of ****): .0000001

Multiply just 1 thru 6, and you get a probability of truth to this
concocktion of 10^-12, or about one in one trillion. Include 0 and 7, and
the probability falls to about 1 in a few million trillion.

And I proly omitted a few probabilities.

Now, you (Harold's circle-jerking compadres here), may wish to assign
differing probabilities to each of the above events, but it would be real
fukn hard, when yer done multiplying, to get anything better than a 1 in one
million shot of this lying cocksucker telling the truth, in this case.

According to my calc's, there's a better chance that Bush's DNA exactly
matches some fukn chimp in the Amazon, than.there is in the pathologically
lying sack of **** Harold telling le truth here.

Ooops, not as remote as I would have liked to have conveyed, but you get the
pitcher.....

Harold, you lying sack of back-stabbing chest-thumping ****, good thing you
are, according to you, so scrupulously honest, cuz yer too fukn stupid to
lie yer way out of a wet toilet paper.
----------------------------
Mr. P.V.'d
formerly Droll Troll

"Harold and Susan Vordos" wrote in message
...
I reported in an earlier post that I had notified HD of a customer that had
pulled a scam, assembling electrical PVC couplings to elbows, with the net
result of the clerk scanning only the coupling, and the customer walking
out
with a smile, having not paid for the elbows.

Monday, I needed wire and other things to install the power to panel for
our
house, so I spent a little time at the same store once again. When I
approached the check stand, the same gal that was checking previously was
manning the station. I recognized her, but didn't know if she did me, or
not, so I said nothing. She had wrung up my purchase and I was counting
out the money when she proudly informed me that the dude had returned the
following day, and, once again, bought more elbows and couplings,
repeating
what he had done the previous day. She didn't mention how many, but
she
couldn't wait to inform me that she had kept a copy of his ticket from his
other visit and informed him that she was charging him for the elbows.
Needless to say, he *hadn't noticed* that he hadn't paid for them, but it
sure seems funny that he was trying the same trick yet again. Draw your
own conclusion.

Imagine that! A happy clerk, still employed! Looks like maybe I did the
right thing, in spite of the few with convoluted thinking that suggested I
had not.

Harold