In article , Andy Hall
wrote:
What you are supporting is criticism designed to destroy that collective
will - usually because it conflicts with the pecuniary interests of rich
parasites.

That's just emotive silliness and there are two fallacies in your statement
- firstly that a collective will is that important, and secondly that
wealth implies not having worked to achieve it.

Collective will is not important; it's essential. Without it we are doomed to
exist as small groups each dictated to by a leader imposing his will by
violence or fear, each group pussyfooting around others or taking over weaker
groups. Collective will provides the means whereby everyone in a group can
contribute to decisions for the group and, by extension, a way to organise
larger groups peacefully.

And whilst there are certainly rich people who are not parasites I restricted
my comment to those that are both. You really do struggle with the logic of
the English language ...

--
John Cartmell john@ followed by finnybank.com 0845 006 8822
Qercus magazine FAX +44 (0)8700-519-527 www.finnybank.com
Qercus - the best guide to RISC OS computing