"*" wrote in message
news:01c5e3a8$f0269b40$9da6c3d8@race...
First, Barney writes.....


Second, there is no god. Except in the imagination of individuals who
can't handle reality. And the reality is: we DID evolve from lower
life forms (aka apes), which in turn evolved from even lower life
forms. No all-powerful entity created us, or the Earth, or the
universe. The whole works evolved over billions of years.

Third, get used to it...because that is the first, last, and ONLY
truth going...




So, the fact that he has spoken, negates ANY written word or centuries-old
records concerning creationism and the existence of God.....The Bible, The
Koran, The Torah, etc....the "blogs" of their era.


Yet, in order to support HIS point, he refers to a number of modern-day
websites - many of which contain the word "atheist"....but remain, of
course, totally unbiased in their research into the existence of God.




It is good that you ask for proof.
These links are only a tiny, tiny fraction of the evidence:




http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...imp_genes.html



http://www.jmooneyham.com/the-case-against-god.html


http://www.positiveatheism.org/writ/dawkins3.htm


http://www.geocities.com/closetatheist/betalove.htm


http://www.mala.bc.ca/~johnstoi/essays/courtenay1.htm




http://angryatheist.blogspot.com/200...tion-works.htm
l


http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaver.../evoverac.html


http://www.impactpress.com/articles/.../thei6798.html



I could go on all day, but i do have to go to work. Maybe I'll post a
couple hundred later on...



Interestingly, there are Christians, Jews and Muslims who could - in all
likelyhood - post 100 times as many centuries-old references supporting
the
existence of God than the recent, atheist-oriented opinions, essays,
blogs,
etc. that you post in the guise of aledgedly unbiased "evidence" that God
does NOT exist.

Opinion does NOT equal fact!

I COULD state that ol' Barney is a drooling idiot of questionable
intelligence, and although several might agree - and it might even ring
true - my opinion cannot be taken seriously as irrefutable fact.

Any following posts stating, "Yeah! Barney IS an idiot!" simply offer MORE
opinion - not fact......

......just like your little school chums writing in their biased,
atheist-agenda-driven publications and blogs.

If we are expected to accept that they are correct in their assessment -
which flies in the face of more established fact - then, we SHOULD be able
to accept that I am correct in MY assessment......."Barney is, in fact, a
drooling idiot."


As soon as you present some real evidence that there is some superbeing you
call God that exists then I'll be glad to change my opinion that it's you
that is the drooling idiot.

Hawke