Many capitalists
don't like Microsoft at all.
Most sports teams don't like there opponents either... So what?
McDonalds doesn't like Burger King. Budweiser doesn't like Miller Beer... I
don't see what your point is.. Who cares who likes who... Has nothing to do
with the economics. That is what capitalism is, not a competition to see
who can win more friends
You cannot cheer capitalism and then curse when one company achieves
ultimate success. You defiantly cannot then call it Communism, That was
the point of my post after all. This matter has been decided by the courts.
You are free to write a competitive OS.
By the way, there are plenty of other Operating systems. Just not very
many aps to run on them. Linux and Free BSD kick MS's ass when it comes to
servers.
So, what is it you want to do? Make the Window OS illegal? Start all
over? Force software companies to release programs to run on all operating
systems. Break up MS and sell it off in pieces to competitors. geesh, that
makes me want my company to be successful. If I achieve success the Govt.
can make me sell it off to my enemies...
I don't see where any of this is going. It's just a bunch of whining about
nothing...
The market makes these choices. Make a good product and you'll be
successful and a good share of people will bash you and curse you and haul
your ass to court and try to get your money. Perhaps even the MOB will
threaten you... If all that happens, then you are a successful capitalist..
"John Doe" wrote in message
...
Everything is fine until a company stifles competition. In fact,
Microsoft holds a monopoly on personal computer operating system
software. Capitalists believe in competition. Microsoft has no
competition for Windows, mainly because of network effects and a
positive feedback loop. The only capitalists who adore Microsoft are
mainly those stockholders who have made a killing. Many capitalists
don't like Microsoft at all.
"DBLEXPOSURE" celstuff hotmail.com wrote:
Path:
newssvr13.news.prodigy.com!newsdbm04.news.prodigy. com!newsdst02.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01b.news.pro digy.com!prodigy.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!pr odigy.net!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.gigan ews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.midco.n et!news.midco.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 13:24:06 -0600
From: "DBLEXPOSURE" celstuff hotmail.com
Newsgroups:
sci.electronics.basics,sci.electronics.repair,alt. comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt
References: lNd9f.552$p37.38 newssvr17.news.prodigy.com
oWe9f.40054$Bf7.37679 tornado.texas.rr.com
360bm1li8v9spuh8uhv95dhi25qe0jad4v 4ax.com 11mbajursouao13
corp.supernews.com 26nbm159lankulsp18gidrvs0rg1vlmb9m 4ax.com
Vat9f.39690$RG4.5791 fe05.lga Xns97013291640DEfollydom 207.115.17.102
7ckem19kc6p8hlauveqnhmr3j5egjfp7ot 4ax.com Xns97013EF13E444follydom
207.115.17.102 e10fm1t8q1rq87ftgq2p7lhnga0r5le55o 4ax.com
Xns9701B2F457861follydom 207.115.17.102
ebvgm158pq32j72bi9c152mp54r5u5b520 4ax.com Xns97027FDA9A9DFfollydom
207.115.17.102
Subject: The truth about OS/2!!! [ Why aren't computer clocks as
accurate as cheap quartz watches?]
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 13:22:15 -0600
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
Message-ID: bZednfQYcbvLj_TeRVn-vA midco.net
Lines: 182
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.220.64.108
X-Trace:
sv3-wv1vumB7w/E2svQM+Ubb+UgagM/jBz396sDaaNUJ8h7v5mFqYDeeBN+yDD3Mfr/CB755ap0YwfiKHYC!SMJlpwUyeAD/ndG5tTPTL9I8gAH2jaXytNI/S39v5f5Lrlp+p+M8RmG2mjmhfwJubCrvWA==
X-Complaints-To: abuse midco.net
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse midco.net
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your
complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.32
Xref: newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com sci.electronics.basics:225859
sci.electronics.repair:427583 alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt:448907
Interesting take on why computer clocks can't keep time.
Those who love communism most appreciate Microsoft's monopolies.
What?!!
Microsoft is a capitalist's wet dream.
Unless you believe in communism, then you might understand that
monopolies can be bad for our economy.
25 different OS's and nobody being able to share files or communicate
would
be better for the economy?
I wonder what a program like Photoshop would cost if Adobe had to write
15
different version so it could run on every possible OS. I wonder if
Photoshop would even exist in a world with that many different OS's.
Fact is, Microsoft is an example of what can be achieved via Capitalism.
Do
you really think that a company of this magnitude would have ever emerged
out of the Soviet union or any other Communist country..?
You don't have to like Microsoft but calling it Communism is just silly.
"John Doe" jdoe usenet.love.invalid wrote in message
news:Xns97027FDA9A9DFfollydom 207.115.17.102...
Mxsmanic mxsmanic gmail.com wrote:
John Doe writes:
Maybe, but the argument was Microsoft's business versus other
software publishers business.
Microsoft does almost all its business in operating systems and its
Office suite. It has very little competition in both domains. It
does not and cannot compete in any of the other thousands of
application domains for PCs in the world, and even if it tried, it
would be up against a lot of well-entrenched competition. The
concerns about monopoly are thus exaggerated and not always well
placed.
That is entirely false. Read how Microsoft crushed Netscape Navigator.
http://usvms.gpo.gov/findfact.html
Microsoft will eventually self-destruct.
Just like IBM self-destructed. Just like Ford Motor Co. self-destructed.
Just like Standard Oil self-destructed (actually had serious antitrust
problems).
Pure speculation. But in fact, Microsoft has a stranglehold on the
personal computer software market. Only a few believed personal
computers
are going away could you believe Microsoft is going away.
So those who hate Microsoft need only be patient. A
Microsoft should be corrected to spur competition among all of the other
capable software developers here in the United States.
Those who love communism most appreciate Microsoft's monopolies.
If you believe Microsoft is okay, then you are just ignorant of the
facts.
Unless you believe in communism, then you might understand that
monopolies can be bad for our economy.
Not necessarily. A lot of public utilities are run as regulated
monopolies,
And in fact, there's very little difference.
Our system thrives on competition.
Some parts do, some parts don't.
What part of "competition" don't you understand?
We don't have competition for the
military.
lol
Sometimes monopolies serve society better. Usually they have to be
heavily regulated if they are turned over to private concerns in order
to prevent abuse, though.
That's why Microsoft has had so much legal trouble. Then George Bush Jr.
came along, and his might-makes-right justice system let up on
correcting
Microsoft.
Snipped silliness
I've heard different.
From whom? Not ordinary consumers.
I guess you haven't interacted with consumers.
You keep saying that and and then dodging the question about whether
those thousands of other programs are very meaningful profit wise.
They are extremely meaningful to the companies that produce them.
Without a single dominant platform for applications,
I have plainly stated at least once already that multiple platforms
might
not be a good idea.
I guess that stuff depends on your definition of "too successful".
I'm talking about Microsoft Corp., the owner of Windows, the
required monopoly operating system for personal computers.
Why just Microsoft? Lots of companies are just as successful as
Microsoft. What property do you propose to seize from them?
I would seize a baseball bat from anybody who aggressively bludgeons
another person to death. I could not care less whether you legally
acquired and own that baseball bat.
What part of "justice" don't you understand?
Why aren't you complaining about Intel, for example?
Because I'm using AMD very well.
--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
Path:
newssvr25.news.prodigy.net!newsdbm05.news.prodigy. com!newsdst02.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01b.news.pro digy.com!prodigy.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!pr odigy.net!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.gigan ews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganew s.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 03:00:50 -0600
From: Mxsmanic mxsmanic gmail.com
Newsgroups:
sci.electronics.basics,sci.electronics.repair,alt. comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt
Subject: The truth about OS/2!!! [ Why aren't computer clocks as
accurate as cheap quartz watches?]
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 10:00:48 +0100
Organization: Just Mxsmanic
Message-ID: ebvgm158pq32j72bi9c152mp54r5u5b520 4ax.com
References: lNd9f.552$p37.38 newssvr17.news.prodigy.com
oWe9f.40054$Bf7.37679 tornado.texas.rr.com
360bm1li8v9spuh8uhv95dhi25qe0jad4v 4ax.com 11mbajursouao13
corp.supernews.com 26nbm159lankulsp18gidrvs0rg1vlmb9m 4ax.com
Vat9f.39690$RG4.5791 fe05.lga Xns97013291640DEfollydom
207.115.17.102
7ckem19kc6p8hlauveqnhmr3j5egjfp7ot 4ax.com Xns97013EF13E444follydom
207.115.17.102 e10fm1t8q1rq87ftgq2p7lhnga0r5le55o 4ax.com
Xns9701B2F457861follydom 207.115.17.102
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 94
X-Trace:
sv3-CuP+A378gpwxrNhKwrgvEp9PpPJQItqoA7wppK/2pKCqoCK+Fqvrztw+37NRcfMLc1E+dNFyyLSxQa2!4/B/1pCSzanE1HMsrxXBpPyw43dH2uCBkSrvha21OsLL5qxVX+UPN2 sZcMOOfQZY8w==
X-Complaints-To: abuse giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your
complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.32
Xref: newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com sci.electronics.basics:225823
sci.electronics.repair:427524 alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt:448868